Wednesday, October 04, 2023
Tuesday, October 03, 2023
Aldimobile Auto Recharge leaves users open to bill shock.
In February I moved to Aldimobile. Overall it's been a good service, but then recently something unexpected happened.
It was after midnight and I received an SMS, "Hi, Your ALDImobile PAYG credit is fully depleted. Please go online or use your mobile app to recharge."
My first reaction was to go and top up the account.
My next reaction was what the? I'm on Auto Recharge. Shouldn't I be covered?
Turns out at the end of the month the Auto Recharge can take up to a day to be applied. So for hours and up to a day, anything you use is taken out of your PAYG balance. Luckily there was only a $4.88 balance which was cleared out by Aldimobile. Never knew where that 12 cents went, but my guess now is data use during the time Auto Recharge hadn't been applied in the past. A second service also had money taken out.
To me the worst-case scenario is you have a large PAYG balance and you're watching a movie online and your balance is cleared out.
Of course, all of this can be found online, as long as you make the effort to read further than the first screens. ALDImobile also states "No bill shock", but isn't an unexpected and an unknown amount being charged what bill shock is?
I didn't know ALDImobile's Auto Recharge meant you weren't fully covered with your monthly payment. Perhaps others don't know as well, which is why I'm sharing this story.
I don't think ALDImobile's Auto Recharge is good enough and as a result, have moved to another provider so this is not an issue.
Kelvin
Sunday, September 24, 2023
Use Bookmarklets to add new features to Microsoft Edge and Google Chrome
Wednesday, September 20, 2023
VicRoads Bundoora, Practical Driving Test #10 with audio guide
Tuesday, March 21, 2023
Anaconda eBike Ride, Box Hill to Templestowe following Google maps directions
Friday, March 10, 2023
VicRoads Heatherton Practical Driving Test #8
Wednesday, February 01, 2023
Keeping you home phone number (landline without the landline) using CrazyTel.
Left a message from a mobile using Aldi's mobile service and the voice quality was excellent. The poor-quality call was from a Vodafone service. In other words, the call quality on the CrazyTel service may not be due to CrazyTel's service, but outside their control.
Monday, January 30, 2023
Practical Driving Test VicRoads Frankston
Wednesday, January 25, 2023
Google's Gmail does not receive emails containing just images or links.
A significant issue with Google's Gmail is when people send emails from outside of Gmail that only contains an image/picture or a link, the recipient using Gmail does not receive the email. The person sending the email does not receive any notification the email failed. The sender doesn't know the person doesn't receive the email and the Gmail user never knows something has been sent to them.
For example, whilst on holidays recently I sent a picture of the Big Pineapple to two friends. One using Gmail and one using a different domain.
The person with Gmail did not receive the picture but the person using a non-Gmail email account had no issues receiving the email. At no time did I know the Gmail user was not receiving the emails with just a picture.
Recently I've tried to share a YouTube video using the share link feature in YouTube. I send using a non-Gmail service and Gmail users do not receive the email. Again, no notification of failure and no idea the Gmail user hasn't received the email.
In summary, if you're sending a link or picture as the only content in an email, and you're sending the email not using Gmail, a Gmail user is unlikely to receive the email.
To avoid this issue, I select the Share option and then send using my Gmail account to other Gmail users. This works for both pictures and links.
I should add the issue with not receiving emails with a link or a picture when using Gmail may also happen if there's other text in the email. For example, today I forwarded an email that had two pictures and the message I had previously sent to another Gmail user who did receive the email. The forward email only had my signature plus the content of the previous email plus the two attachments. When I forwarded the email from my sent items to a second person the Gmail user failed to receive the email. I sent the two pictures in an email using Gmail and the Gmail user received the email. In other words, it can be quite hard to know when something will or won't work with Gmail if you're sending from a non-Gmail account.
If you're not using Gmail and you're sending emails to a Gmail user, and the email contains links or images, there's a high possibility the Gmail user will not receive your email and you won't know.
Kelvin
Update: 28/01/2024
If I recall correctly, to solve this problem I needed to update my mail server records at the hosting company as Google now requires greater authentication.
Tuesday, January 24, 2023
Fake retailer scam websites now a thing. Here's an example for Dotti.
I was recently talking to a customer service representative for a large Australian retailer and they were telling me people would call asking for a refund after being scammed by a fake retailer. I decided to see if this was happening to other retailers and here's an example for Dotti.
If you're buying online make sure you're buying from a legitimate retailer's site. It's so easy for scammers to build duplicate fake sites.
Kelvin
Sunday, January 08, 2023
Wednesday, December 14, 2022
Tuesday, November 22, 2022
Leitner Electric Bike Review versus Anaconda Electric Bike
Thursday, November 17, 2022
Error starting GoPro Player software. "GoPro Player is not currently available in your account."
This felt to me to be more of a Microsoft issue rather than a GoPro issue so I decided to leave feedback on the Microsoft store. Given I'd not been able to access the files for a few days, shortly after posting the feedback the issue disappeared. Coincidence or Microsoft actually checking the feedback I don't know.
The main reason I'm sharing is if others find themselves in the same situation, sharing my experience might save some time.
Kelvin
Monday, November 14, 2022
VicRoads Geelong, Practical Driving Test #4
Sunday, November 13, 2022
VicRoads Dandenong, Practical Driving Test #6
Saturday, November 12, 2022
VicRoads Coolaroo, Practical Driving Test #5
Saturday, November 05, 2022
VicRoads Ringwood, Heatherdale Road, Practical Driving Test #3
Friday, November 04, 2022
Location of Dan Andrews' wife Catherine Andrews crash with cyclist in 2013.
Today I noticed an article about the crash involving Dan Andrews' wife Catherine Andrews and a 15 year old cyclist that occurred in 2013.
I decided to check out the location. You can find the location by copying and pasting the following coordinates or address into Google Maps.
-38.37233221847381, 144.77570100737393
(Melbourne Road and Ridley Street, Blairgowrie)
The accident occurred at 1:10pm on the 7th of January 2013. In 2013 Melbourne Road had a speed limit of 70km/h, which is also the current speed limit. Ridley Street had/has a speed limit of 50km/h.
All I can really say is it must have been gut wrenching for all parties involved. I was once pulling out of a drive very, very slowly where the hedge obscured my view and out of the corner of my eye I noticed something and immediately hit the brakes. It was a small child on a bike who had got ahead of the mother. The bike ended up on it's side and just near or possibly under the wheel of my car (I can't quite recall). No one was hurt, the bike was not damaged, but I was shaken and lived with the memory for some time. There's no winners in this situation.
I don't like checking out accident information as it's often horrible. I do like to understand what may have happened in broad terms so if there's something to learn, I can learn and pass the information on to family and friends.
Using Google Streetview to check out the location you'll see there's no warning to cars that a bike track exists. Nothing. Visibility is very limited. The path is around 17 metres from the main road. There's perhaps 2-3 metres visibility of anyone on the path. A bike travelling at 20km/h would give a driver 0.36-0.72 seconds to respond and hit the brakes. On roads for traffic lights, response time is assumed to be around 1 second. In other words, there may be insufficient time for a driver to respond and apply their brakes irrespective of their speed.
The bike path being 17 metres from the main road is around a house block in from the road. Drivers expect paths to be near roads, not a house block in. But it is a warning when in these areas look out for signs of bike paths and drive appropriately. Cyclists also need to consider they may not be seen. Perhaps some signage or line markings indicating cycling crossing point may be worth considering.
I hope this information may help others in some way. It has certainly taught me to be more alert for bike trails and paths.
Kelvin