Saturday, April 04, 2020
Disinfecting for the coronavirus
We have a commercial grade disinfectant product that can be used to disinfect benches, door handles, etc. I started to wonder whether or not this disinfectant product was really suitable for coronavirus. I have a science degree (haven't used it) so keep in mind I'm not an expert of any type.
When I went to the website for the product I was actually quite surprised. The product made no mention of being effective at disinfecting against viruses. Yes bacteria and pathogens, but no mention of any of the common virus (such as influenza) so effectively using the product I feel is a waste of time, at least for the coronavirus.
It's important that you just don't go out and purchase products thinking they're helping. Make sure the information on the packaging mentions viruses or you could just be wasting your money or worse, not protecting your family even though you're making the effort.
I found this page which I thought was useful. I'd be reluctant to use bleach (call me a chicken) but I did learn not to use bleach and other household products that are acidic. Phew. Didn't know that.
Basically the page is telling us to use an alcohol based product.
I also found what the airlines were doing quite interesting.
Certainly you can see they're making the extra effort to deep clean. Now I do understand the plane uses operating theatre grade filters to filter the air, but a plane isn't an operating theatre with a single patient. There's lots of moving people that are around you and going past you and they're breathing and they can get close. The main take from the article however is the type of products they're using.
All I did really was since I had some doubt about the product, was to perform a search on the product, found the manufacturers website, read the information and there was no mention of the product being suitable for viruses. Keep in mind there may be restrictions on companies by the government in putting such claims on the products, such as extensive testing that isn't worth the time and resources for the company.
Kelvin Eldridge
What proportion of people infected with the coronavirus do not show symptoms?
One of the main problems with the coronavirus is when people first get infected it takes a while before the symptoms show, but a bigger problem is those who are infected with the coronavirus but do not appear to show any symptoms, which is known as asymptomatic.
The following article shares quite a bit of information and through various articles we can estimate those infected but not showing symptoms could be from 17.9% up to 50%. That's one fifth to half of all infected people.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-04/covid-19-coronavirus-without-symptoms-still-contagious/12119942
That's why it's very important for people to self isolate for 14 days, although it does make you wonder how many of the people who self isolate really fully self isolate for the 14 days. In the first instance they had to get home somehow if they were travelling. Then if like the rest of us, you come home with nothing in the pantry or fridge, I'd suspect many picked up supplies. It's just the nature of people.
As an example the below article it states there around 100 Australian doctors and dentists on a cruise.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/17/coronavirus-covid-19-australian-doctors-dentists-stuck-cruise-ship-coast-chile
According to the following article there were a group of 120 medical professionals.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-28/coronavirus-covid-19-cruise-ship-doctors-angry-over-quarantine/12099604
Now this is where we should forget these are medical people and just say people. There were 77 people who were taken to a hotel for isolation. When police later returned 33 had left the hotel, or roughly 43%.
That's just what people do. Were they infected, we don't know. Was there a risk, probably.
This however does show us that if a third to a half of the people are asymptomatic it's important for them to full self isolate.
Although I do wonder why people in this situation can't be tested after a number of days and if they are not infected, continue on their way. Possibly because there's a shortage of test kits.
I thought the following was an interesting example of people lying about their symptoms so they could see their doctor face-to-face. However many people who say they don't have symptoms actually do! That would certainly affect the statistics if people are lying either intentionally, or simply because the ailments are minor. I know as I get older I have symptoms of things and I just put it down to age.
https://www.sunraysiadaily.com.au/news/1114540/people-lying-about-coronavirus-symptoms-says-local-doctor
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Update: 4/04/2020
A police check of 391 returned travellers resulted in 99 of them not being at home. That's a around 25% of people at the time of the check were breaching the self isolation. This would indicate a much higher percentage breach the self isolation. This probably one of the reasons the government now has people self isolate in hotels.
https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/coronavirus-cases-in-victoria-grow-as-dozens-of-people-are-caught-breaching-self-isolation-c-956272
The following article shares quite a bit of information and through various articles we can estimate those infected but not showing symptoms could be from 17.9% up to 50%. That's one fifth to half of all infected people.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-04/covid-19-coronavirus-without-symptoms-still-contagious/12119942
That's why it's very important for people to self isolate for 14 days, although it does make you wonder how many of the people who self isolate really fully self isolate for the 14 days. In the first instance they had to get home somehow if they were travelling. Then if like the rest of us, you come home with nothing in the pantry or fridge, I'd suspect many picked up supplies. It's just the nature of people.
As an example the below article it states there around 100 Australian doctors and dentists on a cruise.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/17/coronavirus-covid-19-australian-doctors-dentists-stuck-cruise-ship-coast-chile
According to the following article there were a group of 120 medical professionals.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-28/coronavirus-covid-19-cruise-ship-doctors-angry-over-quarantine/12099604
Now this is where we should forget these are medical people and just say people. There were 77 people who were taken to a hotel for isolation. When police later returned 33 had left the hotel, or roughly 43%.
That's just what people do. Were they infected, we don't know. Was there a risk, probably.
This however does show us that if a third to a half of the people are asymptomatic it's important for them to full self isolate.
Although I do wonder why people in this situation can't be tested after a number of days and if they are not infected, continue on their way. Possibly because there's a shortage of test kits.
I thought the following was an interesting example of people lying about their symptoms so they could see their doctor face-to-face. However many people who say they don't have symptoms actually do! That would certainly affect the statistics if people are lying either intentionally, or simply because the ailments are minor. I know as I get older I have symptoms of things and I just put it down to age.
https://www.sunraysiadaily.com.au/news/1114540/people-lying-about-coronavirus-symptoms-says-local-doctor
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Update: 4/04/2020
A police check of 391 returned travellers resulted in 99 of them not being at home. That's a around 25% of people at the time of the check were breaching the self isolation. This would indicate a much higher percentage breach the self isolation. This probably one of the reasons the government now has people self isolate in hotels.
https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/coronavirus-cases-in-victoria-grow-as-dozens-of-people-are-caught-breaching-self-isolation-c-956272
Friday, April 03, 2020
With coronavirus is it safer to go to a holiday house or stay at home?
There's many people who are going to smaller towns thinking they're safer. What the country and smaller towns don't realise is they generally have infected people in their area. So really, is the holiday house any safer than being at home. The answer depends and in many cases, it might not be. Make sure you think things through.
I decided to get the coronavirus cases data for the 2nd of March for the Local Government Areas across Victoria. Yes there are less people in regional areas, but it's not really the number of cases that's important, it's the number of cases per head of population. Some regional areas will actually have more infections per head of population than some city areas.
For example, I live in Manningham. There's 17 cases of coronavirus for a population of 125,508 (2018 population statistics) meaning there's 13.5 cases per 100,000 people. Now if I had a holiday house in the Mornington Peninsula, would I consider it safer to go to the holiday house. Most people would think so. However if you look at the data there's been 29.5 cases per 1000. That's over double the number of cases and the way I look at that, twice the chance of coming into contact with someone who is infected.
In addition I have a lot of choices around me from milk bars, petrol stations, small grocery shops to the majors where I can buy goods and services. In the holiday regions everyone goes to the same place. There's really not that much choice. If something goes wrong the medical facilities are often quite limited.
The following is a link to the table I created which shows for each Local Government Area, the number of cases, the population and the number of cases per 100,000 people.
So before you head off thinking you're improving your safety perhaps check the numbers. Do you really want to go to an area where the risk is greater? Knowing the numbers means you can make a better decision for you and your family.
Kelvin Eldridge
Half of people with coronavirus show no symptoms.
Research in Iceland shows that half of the people with coronavirus show no symptoms.
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-symptoms-half-of-infected-people-show-no-signs-of-virus/news-story/8557a0b5e5142a3a6cb9b5f926ea6e91
I've read somewhere (I could be recalling incorrectly) that some people just get symptoms of an upset stomach. Perhaps it's worth keeping this in mind.
If half the people don't show symptoms this is another reason we should all start thinking about wearing masks whilst out in the public. It is a way for each of us to protect others should we be infected by don't know it.
The following article had the headline New Yorkers urged to wear masks in public.
https://7news.com.au/news/health/new-yorkers-urged-to-wear-masks-in-public-c-951097
Kelvin Eldridge
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-symptoms-half-of-infected-people-show-no-signs-of-virus/news-story/8557a0b5e5142a3a6cb9b5f926ea6e91
I've read somewhere (I could be recalling incorrectly) that some people just get symptoms of an upset stomach. Perhaps it's worth keeping this in mind.
If half the people don't show symptoms this is another reason we should all start thinking about wearing masks whilst out in the public. It is a way for each of us to protect others should we be infected by don't know it.
The following article had the headline New Yorkers urged to wear masks in public.
https://7news.com.au/news/health/new-yorkers-urged-to-wear-masks-in-public-c-951097
Kelvin Eldridge
Coronavirus found in 17 nursing homes across Australia
It's concerning our elderly are exposed to the coronavirus and unfortunately there's often no way for them to protect themselves further.
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-australia-live-updates/live-coverage/173cd94e356f69733cb159d02cbfdbfb
According to the following article there's 10 nursing homes the Health Department has not released details about.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-02/coronavirus-cases-which-nursing-homes-with-covid-19/12111294
Both the incidents in Victoria are included in the Coronavirus Victoria public exposure map I've created.
Kelvin Eldridge
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-australia-live-updates/live-coverage/173cd94e356f69733cb159d02cbfdbfb
According to the following article there's 10 nursing homes the Health Department has not released details about.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-02/coronavirus-cases-which-nursing-homes-with-covid-19/12111294
Both the incidents in Victoria are included in the Coronavirus Victoria public exposure map I've created.
Kelvin Eldridge
Thursday, April 02, 2020
News.com.au article on those who have died from coronavirus and where they were infected.
It saddens me to think of the people dying from the coronavirus. Nothing could be worse. I find writing this post difficult for that reason. My thoughts go out to the families.
Today I read that of those who have died three quarters can be traced back to three sources, cruise ships, aged care home and hospitals.
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-australia-threequarters-of-deaths-linked-to-cruise-ships-aged-care-home-and-hospitals/news-story/9fce1be8d3cf7904ceaea35d932b80ba
For me this level of detailed reporting helps answer question and is appreciated. Sometimes if information is not made available to the general public it creates confusion and concern. With more information we're better placed to understand what is happening around us.
Kelvin Eldridge
Today I read that of those who have died three quarters can be traced back to three sources, cruise ships, aged care home and hospitals.
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-australia-threequarters-of-deaths-linked-to-cruise-ships-aged-care-home-and-hospitals/news-story/9fce1be8d3cf7904ceaea35d932b80ba
For me this level of detailed reporting helps answer question and is appreciated. Sometimes if information is not made available to the general public it creates confusion and concern. With more information we're better placed to understand what is happening around us.
Kelvin Eldridge
Wednesday, April 01, 2020
Coronavirus, to wear a mask or not wear a mask. DIY option if masks are sold out.
I thought I'd share a couple of articles which influence me as to whether or not to wear a mask.
The first is a study which was about a person in China who was infected and went on what sounds like a bigger long distance bus. The article shows that other people on the bus got infected, but those wearing a mask did not get infected. If should be kept in mind this may just be luck. Not everyone not wearing a mask got infected either.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8094933/How-one-man-spread-coronavirus-NINE-people-bus.html
The one thing to keep in mind is the government has two roles. Two look after the people and to look after the economy. We however have one role and that is to look after ourselves and our families, whilst at the same time doing our best to look after others. Sometimes what the government does may conflict with what we should do.
For example if everyone were to wear a mask then there wouldn't be enough masks to go around and those that really need to wear masks, such as health workers who risk their lives to look after us, may not be able to access the masks they need. The government needs to look after health workers first and foremost. Without them and keeping them healthy means the rest of us are at greater risk. Therein lies and conflict. You need to make a decision for yourself.
More recently this article about the CDC (Center for Disease Control in America) has started to reconsider the advice given to the general public on the use of masks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/31/health/cdc-masks-coronavirus.html
Finally, if you do wear a mask it is extremely important to educate yourself on the correct way of wearing and using a mask. If is possible that with incorrect usage you may in fact increase your risk of infection. For example letting the mask drop below you face once out of a crowded area to breath means your are keeping the surface of the mask near your face, and that isn't a good idea. Not correctly sanitising your hands when putting on or taking of your mask may increase your risk.
Another article I read was about making your own masks. What was good about the article was there was some scientific type research on the materials to use. So even if you can't buy a mask, you can always make it yourself, or have a friend with sewing skills make it for you.
https://smartairfilters.com/en/blog/best-materials-make-diy-face-mask-virus/
Do keep in mind making your own mask should be a last resort. But if it helps to reduce the chances of infection by half, then that's still better than no protection. Interestingly it may be that a mask helps you stop touching your face more and that's also a good thing.
One thing that is apparent is if you are ill that it's a good idea to wear of mask for the benefit of others. If you are not showing signs of coronavirus (called asymptomatic) then you could be spreading the virus. Wearing a mask reduces the risk to others. If others wear a mask too that reduces the risk to you.
For me it makes sense to wear a mask in public. Remove the mask carefully and make sure I correctly sanitise my hands.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Update: 3/04/2020
It appears the tide is starting to turn with regards to people being advised to wear masks. Lots of information in this article.
https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/coronavirus-update-asia-may-have-been-right-all-along-about-coronavirus-and-face-masks-c-948214
Another article indicating the tide is changing we regards to the advice on wearing masks.
https://www.9news.com.au/world/coronavirus-spread-through-talking-even-breathing-experts-tell-white-house/014db7b0-af3d-4f34-b1f1-605540a19df5
CDC (in the USA) have updated their recommendation to now use cloth face covering.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover.html
Knowing the codes used to name face masks can be confusing. The following has a table which gives the different codes. In Australia P2 is the equivalent of the USA code N95.
https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1791500O/comparison-ffp2-kn95-n95-filtering-facepiece-respirator-classes-tb.pdf
Update: 24/04/2020
In the following study, if I read the discussion correctly, in the situation of an infected child with a virus in a household, if the others in the household adhere to wearing a mask whilst in the presence of the infected person, the can reduce the risk of being infected by 60-80%.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2662657/#R27
The following article relates to Health Care Workers wearing N95 masks with a 62% reduced risk of bacterial infection compared with wearing no mask.
http://www.isg.org.au/index.php/news-items/study-shows-superiority-of-n95-respirators-in-protecting-health-workers-against-bacterial-respiratory-infections./
The first is a study which was about a person in China who was infected and went on what sounds like a bigger long distance bus. The article shows that other people on the bus got infected, but those wearing a mask did not get infected. If should be kept in mind this may just be luck. Not everyone not wearing a mask got infected either.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8094933/How-one-man-spread-coronavirus-NINE-people-bus.html
The one thing to keep in mind is the government has two roles. Two look after the people and to look after the economy. We however have one role and that is to look after ourselves and our families, whilst at the same time doing our best to look after others. Sometimes what the government does may conflict with what we should do.
For example if everyone were to wear a mask then there wouldn't be enough masks to go around and those that really need to wear masks, such as health workers who risk their lives to look after us, may not be able to access the masks they need. The government needs to look after health workers first and foremost. Without them and keeping them healthy means the rest of us are at greater risk. Therein lies and conflict. You need to make a decision for yourself.
More recently this article about the CDC (Center for Disease Control in America) has started to reconsider the advice given to the general public on the use of masks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/31/health/cdc-masks-coronavirus.html
Finally, if you do wear a mask it is extremely important to educate yourself on the correct way of wearing and using a mask. If is possible that with incorrect usage you may in fact increase your risk of infection. For example letting the mask drop below you face once out of a crowded area to breath means your are keeping the surface of the mask near your face, and that isn't a good idea. Not correctly sanitising your hands when putting on or taking of your mask may increase your risk.
Another article I read was about making your own masks. What was good about the article was there was some scientific type research on the materials to use. So even if you can't buy a mask, you can always make it yourself, or have a friend with sewing skills make it for you.
https://smartairfilters.com/en/blog/best-materials-make-diy-face-mask-virus/
Do keep in mind making your own mask should be a last resort. But if it helps to reduce the chances of infection by half, then that's still better than no protection. Interestingly it may be that a mask helps you stop touching your face more and that's also a good thing.
One thing that is apparent is if you are ill that it's a good idea to wear of mask for the benefit of others. If you are not showing signs of coronavirus (called asymptomatic) then you could be spreading the virus. Wearing a mask reduces the risk to others. If others wear a mask too that reduces the risk to you.
For me it makes sense to wear a mask in public. Remove the mask carefully and make sure I correctly sanitise my hands.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Update: 3/04/2020
It appears the tide is starting to turn with regards to people being advised to wear masks. Lots of information in this article.
https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/coronavirus-update-asia-may-have-been-right-all-along-about-coronavirus-and-face-masks-c-948214
Another article indicating the tide is changing we regards to the advice on wearing masks.
https://www.9news.com.au/world/coronavirus-spread-through-talking-even-breathing-experts-tell-white-house/014db7b0-af3d-4f34-b1f1-605540a19df5
CDC (in the USA) have updated their recommendation to now use cloth face covering.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover.html
Knowing the codes used to name face masks can be confusing. The following has a table which gives the different codes. In Australia P2 is the equivalent of the USA code N95.
https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1791500O/comparison-ffp2-kn95-n95-filtering-facepiece-respirator-classes-tb.pdf
Update: 24/04/2020
In the following study, if I read the discussion correctly, in the situation of an infected child with a virus in a household, if the others in the household adhere to wearing a mask whilst in the presence of the infected person, the can reduce the risk of being infected by 60-80%.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2662657/#R27
The following article relates to Health Care Workers wearing N95 masks with a 62% reduced risk of bacterial infection compared with wearing no mask.
http://www.isg.org.au/index.php/news-items/study-shows-superiority-of-n95-respirators-in-protecting-health-workers-against-bacterial-respiratory-infections./
Update: 28/05/2020
The following articles show how effective different masks are when tested. Even surgical masks which don't fit that well performed reasonably. In all cases the risk was at least halved and in some cases nearly 20 time less. That's a significant reduction.
Update: 24/08/2020
In the following article I found the information that wearing masks increases the percentage of people being asymptomatic both good and concerning. Good because people are getting less affect, but bad because having more people asymptomatic means more people may spread the virus because they don't think they're sick.
Story shared by Melbourne doctor shows how infectious coronavirus can be.
I thought I'd share this article. A doctor in Melbourne was at a gathering with 12 friends. Later one of those friends tested positive for coronavirus. Since then all but one have tested positive for coronavirus including the doctor.
https://www.3aw.com.au/coronavirus-melbourne-doctors-warning-after-contracting-covid-19/
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
https://www.3aw.com.au/coronavirus-melbourne-doctors-warning-after-contracting-covid-19/
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Hands, washing hands by Neil Diamond. Sung to the tune of Sweet Caroline.
I thought I'd share the video from Neil Diamond, where he's adapted Sweet Caroline to be more relevant in the time of coronavirus.
https://youtu.be/sPLgsV_Ms3Q
I've always enjoyed Neil Diamond's songs and thank him for adding value to my life through his music.
My one regret. At uni I was passing a room where there was a singer with a guitar sitting on a chair in the middle of a very large room, with a large crowd of people around him. I think everyone was sitting on the floor so it didn't look particularly comfortable. It didn't seem that interesting. I recalled later that singer was most likely Neil Diamond. Perhaps someone was pulling my leg, but I really do regret I didn't stop and listen to a great entertainer.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirus/
https://youtu.be/sPLgsV_Ms3Q
I've always enjoyed Neil Diamond's songs and thank him for adding value to my life through his music.
My one regret. At uni I was passing a room where there was a singer with a guitar sitting on a chair in the middle of a very large room, with a large crowd of people around him. I think everyone was sitting on the floor so it didn't look particularly comfortable. It didn't seem that interesting. I recalled later that singer was most likely Neil Diamond. Perhaps someone was pulling my leg, but I really do regret I didn't stop and listen to a great entertainer.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirus/
Person wondering if there was any chance of getting out of a red light camera fine.
I found an interesting question on the Whirlpool forum today from a person wondering if there was any chance of getting out of a red light camera fine. The quick answer is generally no.
https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/32krv6j9
However I found this intersection to be quite interesting. It took me a while to understand what had happened.
The person was travelling in Surrey Hills NSW, along Foveaux Street turning right into Crown Street. The right turn lane is a dedicated lane for right turning cars. The lights for going straight ahead were green, but there was a red right turn arrow.
If you look at the traffic lights you'll see a stack arrangement of four lights. I've not seen four vertical lights like this in Victoria. The top light it appears is the turn arrow light.
Secondly there's no oncoming traffic as this is a one-way street. In Victoria I've not seen a right turn arrow where there's no traffic coming towards you. Perhaps there is one, but I can't recall one.
The driver in this case noticed the pedestrian walk sign was green but there was no one on the pedestrian crossing. This would indicate the turn arrow may either be timed, or pedestrian activated.
In this case the driver didn't know the right turn arrow was red as their visor was down and this blocked their view of the top turn light.
The obvious lesson here is you need to make sure you can see all traffic lights and make sure your vision is not obscured by your visor. It's also a good reminder to Victorian drivers that some traffic lights in NSW are pedestrian activated.
One things this also shows is the limitation of the traffic light technology. If it is the case that a pedestrian pressed the button to activate the red right turn arrow, but decided to move on and not cross the road, then the pedestrian has impacted the flow of the traffic and a fine has been issued where there zero chance of a safety risk to anyone. In effect the driver has been fine in a situation where there was not safety risk. Ultimately however if a driver doesn't obey the traffic lights, no matter how absurd they've been designed, they are disobeying the law.
In this case a simple and costly mistake by the driver.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.SpeedCameraLocations.com.au
https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/32krv6j9
However I found this intersection to be quite interesting. It took me a while to understand what had happened.
The person was travelling in Surrey Hills NSW, along Foveaux Street turning right into Crown Street. The right turn lane is a dedicated lane for right turning cars. The lights for going straight ahead were green, but there was a red right turn arrow.
If you look at the traffic lights you'll see a stack arrangement of four lights. I've not seen four vertical lights like this in Victoria. The top light it appears is the turn arrow light.
Secondly there's no oncoming traffic as this is a one-way street. In Victoria I've not seen a right turn arrow where there's no traffic coming towards you. Perhaps there is one, but I can't recall one.
The driver in this case noticed the pedestrian walk sign was green but there was no one on the pedestrian crossing. This would indicate the turn arrow may either be timed, or pedestrian activated.
In this case the driver didn't know the right turn arrow was red as their visor was down and this blocked their view of the top turn light.
The obvious lesson here is you need to make sure you can see all traffic lights and make sure your vision is not obscured by your visor. It's also a good reminder to Victorian drivers that some traffic lights in NSW are pedestrian activated.
One things this also shows is the limitation of the traffic light technology. If it is the case that a pedestrian pressed the button to activate the red right turn arrow, but decided to move on and not cross the road, then the pedestrian has impacted the flow of the traffic and a fine has been issued where there zero chance of a safety risk to anyone. In effect the driver has been fine in a situation where there was not safety risk. Ultimately however if a driver doesn't obey the traffic lights, no matter how absurd they've been designed, they are disobeying the law.
In this case a simple and costly mistake by the driver.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.SpeedCameraLocations.com.au
Stay at home directions by the CHO (Chief Health Officer) of Victoria
I'm the type of person who likes to learn the rules of what we are supposed to do or not do. That applies to most things in my life but particularly in times such as now with the coronavirus. In effect I like to be a good citizen.
Even then if I think things can be done better, without conflicting with the government's rules, then I'll take that action as well.
We often joke about one person's parenting style to their child. Their catch-phrase statement was "learn the rules, obey the rules". Perhaps now we have to all behave a little like children and learn the rules and obey the rules. This isn't just for our own benefit, but for the benefit of the community as a whole. If you disobey the rules then think about the thousands of others who are also disobeying the rules. That behaviour even though individually doesn't appear to make much difference, multiply it out by thousands and it can and will make a significant difference. Remember, we are all in this together.
So if you're interested in the rules, in effect the laws currently in place, the following is worth reading.
https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/202003/Stay%20at%20Home%20Directions%20.pdf
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Even then if I think things can be done better, without conflicting with the government's rules, then I'll take that action as well.
We often joke about one person's parenting style to their child. Their catch-phrase statement was "learn the rules, obey the rules". Perhaps now we have to all behave a little like children and learn the rules and obey the rules. This isn't just for our own benefit, but for the benefit of the community as a whole. If you disobey the rules then think about the thousands of others who are also disobeying the rules. That behaviour even though individually doesn't appear to make much difference, multiply it out by thousands and it can and will make a significant difference. Remember, we are all in this together.
So if you're interested in the rules, in effect the laws currently in place, the following is worth reading.
https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/202003/Stay%20at%20Home%20Directions%20.pdf
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Tuesday, March 31, 2020
Coronavirus - tips for handling delivered takeaway food at home
Today I read this article and I got one interesting point on handling takeaway food which I thought was worth sharing.
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-how-to-handle-takeaway-containers-safely-during-covid19-outbreak/news-story/77a410b0e8be9ffb2e8a35044324954f
We supposedly know coronavirus can live for 24 hours on cardboard/paper, so the packaging on delivered takeaway food, which has been handled by other people's hands, may be a risk, albeit it is considered small.
The idea in the article was to have two sections of bench. One where food is initially put and then a second part of the bench where only sanitised food is placed.
For example you get a pizza in a box. The box represents a degree of risk. You don't want to open the box and then touch the food.
Place the box on the bench where unsanitised items are placed. Open the box. Wash your hands. Transfer the pizza to plates on the section of bench which is the sanitised section of bench. Don't touch the box again until after you finish your meal. If say you want to throw out the box first to keep things tidy, then you'll need to wash your hands again before eating your meal.
That's my take on what the article was suggesting and I think it is a good idea. A little extra time and caution in this age of the coronavirus is a good thing.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/coronavirus-how-to-handle-takeaway-containers-safely-during-covid19-outbreak/news-story/77a410b0e8be9ffb2e8a35044324954f
We supposedly know coronavirus can live for 24 hours on cardboard/paper, so the packaging on delivered takeaway food, which has been handled by other people's hands, may be a risk, albeit it is considered small.
The idea in the article was to have two sections of bench. One where food is initially put and then a second part of the bench where only sanitised food is placed.
For example you get a pizza in a box. The box represents a degree of risk. You don't want to open the box and then touch the food.
Place the box on the bench where unsanitised items are placed. Open the box. Wash your hands. Transfer the pizza to plates on the section of bench which is the sanitised section of bench. Don't touch the box again until after you finish your meal. If say you want to throw out the box first to keep things tidy, then you'll need to wash your hands again before eating your meal.
That's my take on what the article was suggesting and I think it is a good idea. A little extra time and caution in this age of the coronavirus is a good thing.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
News on coronavirus (COVID-19) in Victoria for the Mapz site.
A while ago I created a map of the coronavirus public exposure locations in Victoria based on information I find released by the government or media sites. This enabled me and people I know to get their head around what is happening in Victoria with regards to the coronavirus.
You can find the map at www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
I keep adding articles which I found useful to the page in case other people find the articles of interest. However, sometimes I'd like to share an article of interest but the web page isn't really the best place. For example people can't leave comments if they wanted to.
As from today I've now added a News link to the Mapz site for Coronavirus Victoria. The News link will point to this blog, but only show blog posts that have been labelled as relevant for the coronavirus.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
You can find the map at www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
I keep adding articles which I found useful to the page in case other people find the articles of interest. However, sometimes I'd like to share an article of interest but the web page isn't really the best place. For example people can't leave comments if they wanted to.
As from today I've now added a News link to the Mapz site for Coronavirus Victoria. The News link will point to this blog, but only show blog posts that have been labelled as relevant for the coronavirus.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.Mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Who doesn't love penguins! Melbourne Zoo is livestreaming the penguins.
Who doesn't love penguins!
Today I stumbled over a link to the live stream for the penguins at Melbourne Zoo. Perhaps I was lucky but I got to watch as they fed each penguin and the penguin was released. It was around 9:50am, so perhaps that's a good time to check the live feed, or should I say, live stream.
https://youtu.be/mSI7phzCec8
Now if penguins aren't your thing, really, there's other live streams from Melbourne zoos. You can find the live stream using the following link.
https://www.zoo.org.au/animal-house
Here's a tip.
I noticed the top video had a length of over two hours. If you see a video has a length this is not a live stream, but a recorded video.
For the live stream below the video is a red line. If you move the round dot back along the line you can see what happened earlier in the live stream. For example the live stream for the snow leopard cubs showed nothing in the nest box. However by using the slider to go back in time I was able to see the video of the cubs waking up.
If you tap on the left side or the right side of the screen on your mobile phone you can move around 10 seconds in time either earlier or later. For example when I check the live stream for the penguins now there's nothing there. Not particularly exciting. However if I moved back in time I can find some activity. Then tapping on the left or right of the screen I can move around in time around the activity.
With us now facing the prospect of extended self isolation, perhaps a visit to the zoo using live stream may be an activity worth doing.
Kelvin Eldridge
Update: 2/04/2020
Toronga Zoo in NSW also have a number of live streams available at https://taronga.org.au/taronga-tv
Today I stumbled over a link to the live stream for the penguins at Melbourne Zoo. Perhaps I was lucky but I got to watch as they fed each penguin and the penguin was released. It was around 9:50am, so perhaps that's a good time to check the live feed, or should I say, live stream.
https://youtu.be/mSI7phzCec8
Now if penguins aren't your thing, really, there's other live streams from Melbourne zoos. You can find the live stream using the following link.
https://www.zoo.org.au/animal-house
Here's a tip.
I noticed the top video had a length of over two hours. If you see a video has a length this is not a live stream, but a recorded video.
For the live stream below the video is a red line. If you move the round dot back along the line you can see what happened earlier in the live stream. For example the live stream for the snow leopard cubs showed nothing in the nest box. However by using the slider to go back in time I was able to see the video of the cubs waking up.
If you tap on the left side or the right side of the screen on your mobile phone you can move around 10 seconds in time either earlier or later. For example when I check the live stream for the penguins now there's nothing there. Not particularly exciting. However if I moved back in time I can find some activity. Then tapping on the left or right of the screen I can move around in time around the activity.
With us now facing the prospect of extended self isolation, perhaps a visit to the zoo using live stream may be an activity worth doing.
Kelvin Eldridge
Update: 2/04/2020
Toronga Zoo in NSW also have a number of live streams available at https://taronga.org.au/taronga-tv
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Articles of interest added to Mapz site for Victorian coronavirus public exposure locations.
As those reading this blog will know I recently added a map for Victorian coronavirus public exposure locations. You can find the map at www.Mapz.com.au.
Today I've added a number of articles I've found interesting that I've found have helped me gain a handle on coronavirus. You can find the articles on the Victorian coronavirus public exposure locations map at https://www.mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/.
If I read any articles on coronavirus which I feel may be of interest or use to others I'll continue to ad articles and links to the page.
Stay safe.
Kelvin Eldridge
https://www.mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Today I've added a number of articles I've found interesting that I've found have helped me gain a handle on coronavirus. You can find the articles on the Victorian coronavirus public exposure locations map at https://www.mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/.
If I read any articles on coronavirus which I feel may be of interest or use to others I'll continue to ad articles and links to the page.
Stay safe.
Kelvin Eldridge
https://www.mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria/
Tuesday, March 17, 2020
Woolworths and Coles taking wrong direction with coronavirus.
Something is very, very wrong when you see scenes like the the following.
Large crowds of elderly people gathering together to wait for the Woolworths supermarket to open.
The last thing we need is for business to create large crowds of any sought, but to create large crowds of the more vulnerable in our community, the elderly, what were they thinking!
Woolworths and I think Coles are pulling back on their home delivery and click-to-collect options, when in fact these are the exact options they should be expanding. Options that limit close contact with others is what is needed.
Perhaps it's pressure from shows like The Project suggesting a separate time for the elderly. Yes these shows put Woolworths and Coles under pressure to take action and be seen to be taking action, but sometimes you just have to think through the consequences of the actions.
There has to be a better way.
Personally I think home delivery and click-to-collect are far better options. Don't under estimate the elderly in our society. As an IT person I've looked after many elderly people and their computers and the elderly are quite capable at using computers. For those people who can't use computers, irrespective of their age, family can often help. Then we also need options for people without technology and without family and friends that can help.
Kelvin Eldridge
Source: www.News.com.au
Large crowds of elderly people gathering together to wait for the Woolworths supermarket to open.
The last thing we need is for business to create large crowds of any sought, but to create large crowds of the more vulnerable in our community, the elderly, what were they thinking!
Woolworths and I think Coles are pulling back on their home delivery and click-to-collect options, when in fact these are the exact options they should be expanding. Options that limit close contact with others is what is needed.
Perhaps it's pressure from shows like The Project suggesting a separate time for the elderly. Yes these shows put Woolworths and Coles under pressure to take action and be seen to be taking action, but sometimes you just have to think through the consequences of the actions.
There has to be a better way.
Personally I think home delivery and click-to-collect are far better options. Don't under estimate the elderly in our society. As an IT person I've looked after many elderly people and their computers and the elderly are quite capable at using computers. For those people who can't use computers, irrespective of their age, family can often help. Then we also need options for people without technology and without family and friends that can help.
Kelvin Eldridge
Monday, March 16, 2020
Petrol price Melbourne price alert: Unleaded petrol price increasing to 159.9 cents per litre.
Over the last week or so something I've never seen since I've been monitoring petrol prices in Melbournre happened. The average gate price (think wholesale) dropped and kept dropping. First there was the hit because of the coronavirus and then Russia dropped out of OPEC+ and Sudia Arabia apparently started producing more oil further pushing down the price of a barrel of oil. The price of a barrel of oil I read had dropped 20% and could drop another 10%. Whilst it does indicate things are not good for the world economy, it does mean cheaper fuel prices. That is until we get the next price hike which started in Melbourne late Friday.
The average gate price on Friday had dropped to around 113.0. At the time of the last price hike the average gate price was 126.2, the time before 133.9, so we've seen a good drop in the average gate price and that usually means a drop in the retail price.
Previously, as I've mentioned many times, the price hike was usually between 25-30 cents per litre, but more recently we've been hit with a more significant price hike of around 40 cents per litre. With the current price hike and petrol prices hiking up to 159.9, that means we're seeing a massive price hike of around 46 cents per litre. That's a staggering price hike and I really can't see why the media isn't jumping up and down on this.
The last price hike prices dropped over 10 cents fairly quickly as those that hiked their prices early, were already dropping prices, whilst the late price hikers were still hiking up prices. That meant shopping around could save a considerable amount.
Now's the time to start carefully watching petrol prices and fill up those petrol tanks soon. Then if you're using the 7 Eleven Fuel app, wait a couple of days if you can, and lock in the low price for another week.
With the coronavirus now impacting Victorians I can see myself in general using my car less. Less trips to the shops and more staying at home, or visiting family and friends. Less going to places where there's lots of people. It's just the world we currently live in at the moment.
Take care everyone.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.PetrolPricesMelbourne.com.au
Update: 26/03/2020
Recently the press has picked up petrol prices are significantly higher than they should be. Some may call this profiteering by the petrol retailers. The ACCC has made some noise and said all they could do is to name and shame.
https://thenewdaily.com.au/finance/consumer/2020/03/19/petrol-prices-coronavirus/
Perhaps this has had an effect as the recent price hike figure for more recent retails appears to be 139.9 and sometimes 135.9. That's a quick 20 cent drop for may retailers.
Still, with the average gate price today at 90.1 cents per litre for unleaded petrol, it looks like 139.9 is still price gouging.
Shop around. There's still plenty of petrol stations with prices around 113.9 or less. If you're lucky to be in the west around Laverton, prices are in the 90s.
Sadly we get no relief from the huge 61 cents per litre of Federal tax.
The average gate price on Friday had dropped to around 113.0. At the time of the last price hike the average gate price was 126.2, the time before 133.9, so we've seen a good drop in the average gate price and that usually means a drop in the retail price.
Previously, as I've mentioned many times, the price hike was usually between 25-30 cents per litre, but more recently we've been hit with a more significant price hike of around 40 cents per litre. With the current price hike and petrol prices hiking up to 159.9, that means we're seeing a massive price hike of around 46 cents per litre. That's a staggering price hike and I really can't see why the media isn't jumping up and down on this.
The last price hike prices dropped over 10 cents fairly quickly as those that hiked their prices early, were already dropping prices, whilst the late price hikers were still hiking up prices. That meant shopping around could save a considerable amount.
Now's the time to start carefully watching petrol prices and fill up those petrol tanks soon. Then if you're using the 7 Eleven Fuel app, wait a couple of days if you can, and lock in the low price for another week.
With the coronavirus now impacting Victorians I can see myself in general using my car less. Less trips to the shops and more staying at home, or visiting family and friends. Less going to places where there's lots of people. It's just the world we currently live in at the moment.
Take care everyone.
Kelvin Eldridge
www.PetrolPricesMelbourne.com.au
Update: 26/03/2020
Recently the press has picked up petrol prices are significantly higher than they should be. Some may call this profiteering by the petrol retailers. The ACCC has made some noise and said all they could do is to name and shame.
https://thenewdaily.com.au/finance/consumer/2020/03/19/petrol-prices-coronavirus/
Perhaps this has had an effect as the recent price hike figure for more recent retails appears to be 139.9 and sometimes 135.9. That's a quick 20 cent drop for may retailers.
Still, with the average gate price today at 90.1 cents per litre for unleaded petrol, it looks like 139.9 is still price gouging.
Shop around. There's still plenty of petrol stations with prices around 113.9 or less. If you're lucky to be in the west around Laverton, prices are in the 90s.
Sadly we get no relief from the huge 61 cents per litre of Federal tax.
Thursday, March 12, 2020
Coronavirus public exposure locations in Victoria
I couldn't help feel it might be useful to put together a map of the coronavirus public exposure locations around Victoria. I find just reading the articles on a day by day basis wasn't really helping so perhaps a map might help more.
To my surprise there's more public exposure locations around me than I had expected so the map has achieved the desired outcome and made me more aware of the level of exposure around me.
If anyone else is interested in a map of the coronavirus public exposure locations in Victoria you can find the map at https://www.mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria//
Kelvin Eldridge
Coronavirus public exposure locations in Victoria
PS. I hope to continue updating the map as I read of new public exposure locations in the media each day. At some point the public locations will be quite numerous so it will be of little use to continue updating the map. When that happens I'll add a note to the map to let people know.
To my surprise there's more public exposure locations around me than I had expected so the map has achieved the desired outcome and made me more aware of the level of exposure around me.
If anyone else is interested in a map of the coronavirus public exposure locations in Victoria you can find the map at https://www.mapz.com.au/coronavirusvictoria//
Kelvin Eldridge
Coronavirus public exposure locations in Victoria
PS. I hope to continue updating the map as I read of new public exposure locations in the media each day. At some point the public locations will be quite numerous so it will be of little use to continue updating the map. When that happens I'll add a note to the map to let people know.
Fitzsimons Lane Update - Williamsons Road and Foote Street
About a month ago I received a brochure on the Fitzsimons Lane Update in the mail. I'm interested in changes in the area which may impact me so I watch out for changes. Even though this brochure states there's been extensive community communication, this was the first time I'd heard of the changes and that appears true of others I spoke or heard from.
I've broken this post into three. One for the Fitzsimons Lane and Main Road roundabout Eltham, one for Fitzsimons Lane and Porter Street Templestowe and one for Williamsons Road and Foote Street Templestowe. This is so if there's any comments people can make comments on the specific intersection.
Details of the project are available from the Major Road Projects Victoria website at https://roadprojects.vic.gov.au/projects/northern-roads-upgrade/fitzsimons-lane
Last night I attended an open meeting where people could meet with and discuss their concerns with MRPV staff and see more detailed plans. I had an excellent conversation with a staff member and whilst I felt happy with the answers, in hindsight I can see issues that concern me. I can see others had their own issues and concerns.
My aim here is to share the issues I feel exist with the current intersection of Williamsons Road and Foote Street and how this has changed with the proposed design. Over the 30 years I've lived in Templestowe I've used theWilliamsons Road and Foote Street intersection thousands of times. The following are the issues I've had.
1. Traffic heading east on Foote Street.
The level of traffic banking up heading east can mean slow drive times.
I can't see the new design change this issue.
2. Williamsons Road heading north turning right into Foote Street
The level of traffic heading north can be considerable with delays reaching over the hill and back to Ruffey Creek or further.
If the new design of the Fitzsimons Lane and Porter Street traffic lights improves traffic flow this may improve the situation where the traffic on Williamsons Road Banks up to Foote Street thus enabling more cars to pass through.
3. Exiting onto Foote Street from Hawtin Street.
Turning right from Hawtin Street into Foote Street has become more difficult since the bus lane was added and the median strip effectively removed. However this was still possible with a considerable delay.
Turning left from Hawting Street into Foote Street can sometimes be a considerable delay with cars continuously from the slip lane in Williamsons Road between cars going east on Foote Street with the traffic lights and those turning east from Williamsons Road into Foote Street with the right turn light with sometimes a considerable delay. Further the U-Turn up the hill on Foote Street is close to he the peak of the hill creating a dangerous situation. This was very poor design.
The new design stops right turns from Hawtin Street into Foote Street which is a complete loss. The new design doesn't appear to help in any way.
Unfortunately I didn't check where the right turn lanes turning into Williamsons Road from Foote Street extended to. I'd be interested to see if they've moved the U-Turn further away from the crest of the hill.
4. Bank up of traffic in Foote Street approaching Williamsons Road backs up close to the crest of the hill and there are often accidents as cars don't see stopped cars over the hill. It's understandable because people are accelerating to get over a very steep hill so the car builds a lot of momentum so a car stopped just over the crest is not visible and there's little time to break. Add the late afternoon sun to blind people and it's a real safety issue. There needs to be warning lights on the approach side of the hill if the traffic is banked up to this point.
4. Footpaths and Cycle paths on Williamsons Road have limited length.
The footpaths and cycle paths on Williamsons Road aren't designed for people to use for walking or cycling. They are limited in length and really only for access to bus stops. Whilst an inconvenience this is not a major issue.
The new design provides continous paths for this section of Williamsons Road.
5. The bus turning right from Foote Street into Williamsons Road had to stop at the traffic lights when cars could turn.
To me this didn't make sense. There's three lanes. Why couldn't all three lanes go at the same time? Having a bus lane and the bus not going when other lanes could turn didn't make sense. A call to VicRoads gave me the answer. The three lanes didn't have sufficient turning room for all three lanes to turn into Williamsons Road at the same time. All that work to speed up the bus and it now had to wait.
The new design appears to fix this issue.
6. The bank up of traffic on Foote Street heading west can cause considerable delays to turn into Hawting Street.
The new design includes more space with straight lanes for cars turning right. This should help move more cars into Williamsons Road. However it's hard to see this working when already the cars in Williamsons Road bank up to Foote Street so not all cars can get through. Perhaps the Fitzsimons Lane and Porter Street intersection will improve this.
7. The new design has a bus lane and then a bus stop in the extended slip lane, effectively meaning the bus uses two lanes at this point. This seems like a poor design
Suggestion
I made a suggestion the slip lane traffic in Williamsons Road have some delay to enable cars to exit Hawtin Street onto Foote Street safely. The thought that came back is the slip lane could have lights synchronised with the normal traffic lights depending on how that would impact the overall flow of the intersection.
I get the main goal is to move as much traffic as possible which benefits the most people. However the slip lane creates a safety issue where people trying to exit Hawtin Street turning left (or currently) also turning right) are put under unacceptable pressure to dart out.
Conclusion
Overall I see the new design has reduced the amenity of local residents who need to use Hawtin Street. The area continues to get squeezed in terms of road access. To a degree this is understandable due to the increasing needs of the many who use Williamsons Road, Fitzsimons Lane and Foote Steet.
The new design does not help in any way that I can see improve the situation for exiting Hawtin Street onto Foote Street and in fact makes it worse by removing the ability to turn right onto Foote Street.
Kelvin Eldridge
Please feel free to add your experiences of this intersection using the comments.
I've broken this post into three. One for the Fitzsimons Lane and Main Road roundabout Eltham, one for Fitzsimons Lane and Porter Street Templestowe and one for Williamsons Road and Foote Street Templestowe. This is so if there's any comments people can make comments on the specific intersection.
Details of the project are available from the Major Road Projects Victoria website at https://roadprojects.vic.gov.au/projects/northern-roads-upgrade/fitzsimons-lane
Last night I attended an open meeting where people could meet with and discuss their concerns with MRPV staff and see more detailed plans. I had an excellent conversation with a staff member and whilst I felt happy with the answers, in hindsight I can see issues that concern me. I can see others had their own issues and concerns.
My aim here is to share the issues I feel exist with the current intersection of Williamsons Road and Foote Street and how this has changed with the proposed design. Over the 30 years I've lived in Templestowe I've used theWilliamsons Road and Foote Street intersection thousands of times. The following are the issues I've had.
1. Traffic heading east on Foote Street.
The level of traffic banking up heading east can mean slow drive times.
I can't see the new design change this issue.
2. Williamsons Road heading north turning right into Foote Street
The level of traffic heading north can be considerable with delays reaching over the hill and back to Ruffey Creek or further.
If the new design of the Fitzsimons Lane and Porter Street traffic lights improves traffic flow this may improve the situation where the traffic on Williamsons Road Banks up to Foote Street thus enabling more cars to pass through.
3. Exiting onto Foote Street from Hawtin Street.
Turning right from Hawtin Street into Foote Street has become more difficult since the bus lane was added and the median strip effectively removed. However this was still possible with a considerable delay.
Turning left from Hawting Street into Foote Street can sometimes be a considerable delay with cars continuously from the slip lane in Williamsons Road between cars going east on Foote Street with the traffic lights and those turning east from Williamsons Road into Foote Street with the right turn light with sometimes a considerable delay. Further the U-Turn up the hill on Foote Street is close to he the peak of the hill creating a dangerous situation. This was very poor design.
The new design stops right turns from Hawtin Street into Foote Street which is a complete loss. The new design doesn't appear to help in any way.
Unfortunately I didn't check where the right turn lanes turning into Williamsons Road from Foote Street extended to. I'd be interested to see if they've moved the U-Turn further away from the crest of the hill.
4. Bank up of traffic in Foote Street approaching Williamsons Road backs up close to the crest of the hill and there are often accidents as cars don't see stopped cars over the hill. It's understandable because people are accelerating to get over a very steep hill so the car builds a lot of momentum so a car stopped just over the crest is not visible and there's little time to break. Add the late afternoon sun to blind people and it's a real safety issue. There needs to be warning lights on the approach side of the hill if the traffic is banked up to this point.
4. Footpaths and Cycle paths on Williamsons Road have limited length.
The footpaths and cycle paths on Williamsons Road aren't designed for people to use for walking or cycling. They are limited in length and really only for access to bus stops. Whilst an inconvenience this is not a major issue.
The new design provides continous paths for this section of Williamsons Road.
5. The bus turning right from Foote Street into Williamsons Road had to stop at the traffic lights when cars could turn.
To me this didn't make sense. There's three lanes. Why couldn't all three lanes go at the same time? Having a bus lane and the bus not going when other lanes could turn didn't make sense. A call to VicRoads gave me the answer. The three lanes didn't have sufficient turning room for all three lanes to turn into Williamsons Road at the same time. All that work to speed up the bus and it now had to wait.
The new design appears to fix this issue.
6. The bank up of traffic on Foote Street heading west can cause considerable delays to turn into Hawting Street.
The new design includes more space with straight lanes for cars turning right. This should help move more cars into Williamsons Road. However it's hard to see this working when already the cars in Williamsons Road bank up to Foote Street so not all cars can get through. Perhaps the Fitzsimons Lane and Porter Street intersection will improve this.
7. The new design has a bus lane and then a bus stop in the extended slip lane, effectively meaning the bus uses two lanes at this point. This seems like a poor design
Suggestion
I made a suggestion the slip lane traffic in Williamsons Road have some delay to enable cars to exit Hawtin Street onto Foote Street safely. The thought that came back is the slip lane could have lights synchronised with the normal traffic lights depending on how that would impact the overall flow of the intersection.
I get the main goal is to move as much traffic as possible which benefits the most people. However the slip lane creates a safety issue where people trying to exit Hawtin Street turning left (or currently) also turning right) are put under unacceptable pressure to dart out.
Conclusion
Overall I see the new design has reduced the amenity of local residents who need to use Hawtin Street. The area continues to get squeezed in terms of road access. To a degree this is understandable due to the increasing needs of the many who use Williamsons Road, Fitzsimons Lane and Foote Steet.
The new design does not help in any way that I can see improve the situation for exiting Hawtin Street onto Foote Street and in fact makes it worse by removing the ability to turn right onto Foote Street.
Kelvin Eldridge
Please feel free to add your experiences of this intersection using the comments.
Fitzsimons Lane Update - Fitzsimons Lane and Porter Street
About a month ago I received a brochure on the Fitzsimons Lane Update in the mail. I'm interested in changes in the area which may impact me so I watch out for changes. Even though this brochure states there's been extensive community communication, this was the first time I'd heard of the changes and that appears true of others I spoke or heard from.
I've broken this post into three. One for the Fitzsimons Lane and Main Road roundabout Eltham, one for Fitzsimons Lane and Porter Street Templestowe and one for Williamsons Road and Foote Street Templestowe. This is so if there's any comments people can make comments on the specific intersection.
Details of the project are available from the Major Road Projects Victoria website at https://roadprojects.vic.gov.au/projects/northern-roads-upgrade/fitzsimons-lane
Last night I attended an open meeting where people could meet with and discuss their concerns with MRPV staff and see more detailed plans. I had an excellent conversation with a staff member and whilst I felt happy with the answers, in hindsight I can see issues that concern me. I can see others had their own issues and concerns.
My aim here is to share the issues I feel exist with the current roundabout and how this has changed with the proposed design. Over the 30 years I've lived in Templestowe I've used the Fitzsimons Lane/Porter Street roundabout thousands of times. The following are the issues I've had.
1. Turning left into from Fitzsimons Lane into Porter Street heading east cars behind often try to overtake me but the problem is I then turn into Hawtin Street. You can't turn left into Porter Street into the left lane as the lead foots think the second lane gives them an opportunity to speed past. This is extremely regular.
The new design fixes this issue as there's clearly the slip lane going into one lane on Porter Street.
2. From Porter Street turning right into Fitzsimons Lane people heading east on Porter Street turning left into Fitzsimons Lane simply don't give way. The cut out and cut off traffic.
This is very dangerous and the new design will fix this issue.
3. Turning right from Porter Street into Fitzsimons Lane then left into the Coles Express service station you get mostly the cars again from Porter Street turning left into Fitzsimons Lane cutting you off. They literally try to race you.
The new design fixes this issue.
4. Crossing the intersection as a pedestrian isn't good. There's a long detour to the new pedestrian traffic lights. Now other pedestrian crossing that offers safety for pedestrians.
The new design provides proper facilities for pedestrians making it safer.
5. The pedestrian crossing is poorly placed and when used causes cars to block the roundabout.
The new design fixes this issue.
6. Turning left from Hawtin Steet into Porter Street to turn right into Fitzsimons Lane can be difficult with cars blocking the Keep Clear area but it can be done. People do eventually let you in.
The new design will make it impossible to get out of Hawtin Street to turn right into Fitzsimons Lane. There's now three lanes of traffic and no Keep Clear area and no reason for people to leave a section of the road open for people trying to exit Hawtin Street.
This is a complete failure of the design.
7. Turning right into Hawtin Street from Porter Street is tricky and care has to be taken during busy times. There's two lanes of heavy traffic at this point and a third lane which doesn't have many cars, but the cars do drive past the stopped cars creating a dangerous situation for turning drivers. I usually crawl through to make sure there's no cars using the third lane.
I can't say the new design fixes this problem as they've eliminated the ability to turn into Hawtin Street. In doing so they've created a problem getting into and out of Hawtin Street.
A U-turn is provided further east but the problem is this is reliant on cars letting you through. In busy times the traffic is generally past this point and even with the extra lane space to hold more cars I really think the cars will be back past this point. In effect the area I live in will have a significant loss of entry and exit capability.
8. Right turn from Porter Street into the Templestowe Reserve has not been an issue.
The new design creates an issue as the ability to right turn into the Templestowe Reserve has been removed. This is a very popular park with a lot of activity at peak times. Losing the ability to right turn could be an issue for some. There is a U-Turn to enable people to U-Turn and then left turn into the Templestowe Reserve. The ability to right turn out of the Templestowe Reserve has been removed. All cars must turn left.
9. Right turn from Hawtin Street into Porter Street towards Warrandyte has been removed.
The new design appears to provide the ability to U-Turn at the traffic lights however from my testing of U-Turns if the lanes are not sufficiently wide it won't be possible for the majority of cars to U-Turn. Anything with a poor turning circle will find it difficult to U-Turn at the traffic lights.
I consider the removal of the ability to turn into Hawtin Street from Porter Street and out of Hawtin Street into Porter Street to be a failure of this design.
10. Hawtin Street is used as a rat-run for cars trying to avoid Williamson Road. This creates a considerable bank up of cars exiting Hawtin Street turning left onto Porter Street with the aim then to turn right into Fitzsimons Lane.
Since the Keep Clear section has been removed because cars can't turn into Hawtin Street from Porter Street this means turning from Hawtin Street left into Porter Street will become close to impossible. The rat-run in theory will be useless to others but until people realise the ability to use Hawtin Street to exit the area originally known as the Mountain View Estate wll be close to impossible. Only the southern exit of Hawtin Street will be usable at busy times.
Also keep in mind Hawtin Street becomes busy at the start and end of school times as parents with children in the Templestowe Park Primary School use Hawtin Street to access the rear of Templestowe Park Primary School.
I consider the removal of the ability to enter and exit Hawtin Street a complete failure of the new design. To me there is a considerable safety issue when a complete housing area is effectively forced to use a single exit and then only with the ability to turn left.
11. Hawtin Street exit onto Foote Street used to work well until the bus lane was introduced and the median strip reduced so it was no longer functional.
During busy times it's no longer possible to turn right out of Hawtin Street into Foote Street. You can still turn right during quieter times. Turing left out of Hawtin Street into Foote Street can be slow as there's a constant stream of traffic from the slip lane in Williamsons Road turning left into Foote Street, in addition to the traffic heading east when the lights change, plus the turning traffic from Williamsons Road turning right to head east into Foote Street. At times the delay to exit Hawtin Street can be considerable.
The new design completely removes the ability to turn right into Foote Street from Hawtin Street. This is a minor inconvenience and the option to turn right when available would be nice. However providing the option to turn right means people can sit and wait forever to get the opportunity and don't think about the cars behind them waiting.
The real problem is this exit is already an issue. With the northern end of Hawtin Street in the new design becoming an issue to exit more cars will use the southern exit causing even longer delays.
To me this is a safety issue. Putting more traffic on this exit will put exiting drivers under pressure to exit when it might not be safe to do so.
12. One benefit of the new design is for those exiting Hawtin Street turning left into Porter Street to then turn left into Williamsons Road.
Because there will be a permanent jump lane for the bus (short bus lane) you can exit Hawtin Street into the bus lane and then left turn using the slip lane into Williamsons Road. Because the bus lane will be empty most of the time, as long as Hawtin Street isn't backed up by those using Hawtin Street as a rat run, this will make a good alternative to trying to exit Hawtin Street right into Foote Street. Yes we have to go north to go south, but it's a compromise that's perhaps acceptable.
People need to keep in mind you are allowed to travel up to 100 metres in a bus lane to exit and enter a road so using the bus lane in this way is legal,
https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/safety-and-road-rules/road-rules/a-to-z-of-road-rules/buses
12. A benefit of the new design is those exiting the Coles Express service station onto Fitzsimons Lane can use the bus lane for up to 100 metres and safely merge into the traffic.
13. The addition of a left turn lane heading north from Williamsons Road into Porter Street heading west seems to me like a complete waste of time. The volume of cars turning left into Porter Street could easily use the bus lane to turn left without overly affecting the bus times.
14. The U-Turn in Porter Street to assist those entering the Templestowe Reserve and Hawtin Street should to a large degree overcome the removal of the direct turns. However it's uncertain if these will work well in busy times with cars not letting other cars through and no reason for them to do so except out of courtesy.
The right turn from Porter Street into Hawtin Street or the Templestowe Reserve could remain and not cause any major issues. The reason is these cars will not block the traffic on Porter Street heading east as cars are allowed into bus lanes to overtake a right turning vehicle.
I understand how right turning vehicles coming out of the Templestowe Reserve and Hawtin Street pose a safety issue trying to cross up to three lanes of traffic to turn right. This could be fixed by having exits out of Hawtin Street and the Templestowe Reserve to be left turn only.
This keeps the Keep Clear zones which enables cars to merge from Hawtin Street (and potentially the Templestowe Reserve if a Keep Clear was added) into the right lanes to turn into Fitzsimons Lane.
15. The removal of much of the mound separating the end of Clarke Street and Williamsons Road seems like it is unnecessary.
Is a left turn only lane here really that necessary? Surely cars turning left can share the bus lane.
Perhaps less of the mound can be removed if the left turn lane was not required.
Suggestion
1. Hawtin Street is a rat-run and that's understandable. We would all use a minor road if we felt it could improve our travel time. However these changes mean exiting out of Hawtin Street into Porter Street to turn right into Fitzsimons Lane will be near impossible in busy times. Even to exit Hawtin Street to turn left to continue on Porter Street, or left into Williamsons Road will be near impossible unless cars are made to leave room, which is what the Keep Clear does.
Is it possible to have Hawtin Street as local traffic only and impose fines?
Keep the Keep Clear zone so cars can exit Hawtin Street more easily.
2. Carole Close is currently closed. Opening Carol Close onto Williamsons Road would enable the local traffic using Hawtin Street to enter and exit Hawtin Street. This change provides convenience for Hawtin Street users. It does however affect two properties in Carol Street where the properties have been subdivided.
To counter this if the U-Turn in Porter Street works and using the bus lane to turn left out of Hawtin Street and the slip lane into Williamsons Road means this change wouldn't be required. Reducing the volume of cars using Hawtin Street as a rat-run would mean this isn't really required.
3. Enforcing local traffic only along Hawtin Street could significantly help the flow of local traffic using Hawtin Street.
Conclusion
Overall I see the new design has reduced the amenity of local residents who need to use Hawtin Street. The area continues to get squeezed in terms of road access. To a degree this is understandable due to the increasing needs of the many who use Williamsons Road, Fitzsimons Lane and Foote Steet.
The fail in the design is since cars travelling along Porter Street no longer need to leave space for cars leaving Hawtin Street the drivers simply won't leave space. Cars won't be able to easily exit Hawtin Street into Porter Street to either continue on Porter Street or turn right into Fitzsimons Lane. A Keep Clear section will need to be added to enable cars to exit Hawtin Street into Porter Street. Whilst it is not legal for cars from Hawtin Street to sit in the Keep Clear area this seems to be the only practical way for cars to exit Hawtin Street.
Kelvin Eldridge
Please feel free to add your experiences of this intersection using the comments.
I've broken this post into three. One for the Fitzsimons Lane and Main Road roundabout Eltham, one for Fitzsimons Lane and Porter Street Templestowe and one for Williamsons Road and Foote Street Templestowe. This is so if there's any comments people can make comments on the specific intersection.
Details of the project are available from the Major Road Projects Victoria website at https://roadprojects.vic.gov.au/projects/northern-roads-upgrade/fitzsimons-lane
Last night I attended an open meeting where people could meet with and discuss their concerns with MRPV staff and see more detailed plans. I had an excellent conversation with a staff member and whilst I felt happy with the answers, in hindsight I can see issues that concern me. I can see others had their own issues and concerns.
My aim here is to share the issues I feel exist with the current roundabout and how this has changed with the proposed design. Over the 30 years I've lived in Templestowe I've used the Fitzsimons Lane/Porter Street roundabout thousands of times. The following are the issues I've had.
1. Turning left into from Fitzsimons Lane into Porter Street heading east cars behind often try to overtake me but the problem is I then turn into Hawtin Street. You can't turn left into Porter Street into the left lane as the lead foots think the second lane gives them an opportunity to speed past. This is extremely regular.
The new design fixes this issue as there's clearly the slip lane going into one lane on Porter Street.
2. From Porter Street turning right into Fitzsimons Lane people heading east on Porter Street turning left into Fitzsimons Lane simply don't give way. The cut out and cut off traffic.
This is very dangerous and the new design will fix this issue.
3. Turning right from Porter Street into Fitzsimons Lane then left into the Coles Express service station you get mostly the cars again from Porter Street turning left into Fitzsimons Lane cutting you off. They literally try to race you.
The new design fixes this issue.
4. Crossing the intersection as a pedestrian isn't good. There's a long detour to the new pedestrian traffic lights. Now other pedestrian crossing that offers safety for pedestrians.
The new design provides proper facilities for pedestrians making it safer.
5. The pedestrian crossing is poorly placed and when used causes cars to block the roundabout.
The new design fixes this issue.
6. Turning left from Hawtin Steet into Porter Street to turn right into Fitzsimons Lane can be difficult with cars blocking the Keep Clear area but it can be done. People do eventually let you in.
The new design will make it impossible to get out of Hawtin Street to turn right into Fitzsimons Lane. There's now three lanes of traffic and no Keep Clear area and no reason for people to leave a section of the road open for people trying to exit Hawtin Street.
This is a complete failure of the design.
7. Turning right into Hawtin Street from Porter Street is tricky and care has to be taken during busy times. There's two lanes of heavy traffic at this point and a third lane which doesn't have many cars, but the cars do drive past the stopped cars creating a dangerous situation for turning drivers. I usually crawl through to make sure there's no cars using the third lane.
I can't say the new design fixes this problem as they've eliminated the ability to turn into Hawtin Street. In doing so they've created a problem getting into and out of Hawtin Street.
A U-turn is provided further east but the problem is this is reliant on cars letting you through. In busy times the traffic is generally past this point and even with the extra lane space to hold more cars I really think the cars will be back past this point. In effect the area I live in will have a significant loss of entry and exit capability.
8. Right turn from Porter Street into the Templestowe Reserve has not been an issue.
The new design creates an issue as the ability to right turn into the Templestowe Reserve has been removed. This is a very popular park with a lot of activity at peak times. Losing the ability to right turn could be an issue for some. There is a U-Turn to enable people to U-Turn and then left turn into the Templestowe Reserve. The ability to right turn out of the Templestowe Reserve has been removed. All cars must turn left.
9. Right turn from Hawtin Street into Porter Street towards Warrandyte has been removed.
The new design appears to provide the ability to U-Turn at the traffic lights however from my testing of U-Turns if the lanes are not sufficiently wide it won't be possible for the majority of cars to U-Turn. Anything with a poor turning circle will find it difficult to U-Turn at the traffic lights.
I consider the removal of the ability to turn into Hawtin Street from Porter Street and out of Hawtin Street into Porter Street to be a failure of this design.
10. Hawtin Street is used as a rat-run for cars trying to avoid Williamson Road. This creates a considerable bank up of cars exiting Hawtin Street turning left onto Porter Street with the aim then to turn right into Fitzsimons Lane.
Since the Keep Clear section has been removed because cars can't turn into Hawtin Street from Porter Street this means turning from Hawtin Street left into Porter Street will become close to impossible. The rat-run in theory will be useless to others but until people realise the ability to use Hawtin Street to exit the area originally known as the Mountain View Estate wll be close to impossible. Only the southern exit of Hawtin Street will be usable at busy times.
Also keep in mind Hawtin Street becomes busy at the start and end of school times as parents with children in the Templestowe Park Primary School use Hawtin Street to access the rear of Templestowe Park Primary School.
I consider the removal of the ability to enter and exit Hawtin Street a complete failure of the new design. To me there is a considerable safety issue when a complete housing area is effectively forced to use a single exit and then only with the ability to turn left.
11. Hawtin Street exit onto Foote Street used to work well until the bus lane was introduced and the median strip reduced so it was no longer functional.
During busy times it's no longer possible to turn right out of Hawtin Street into Foote Street. You can still turn right during quieter times. Turing left out of Hawtin Street into Foote Street can be slow as there's a constant stream of traffic from the slip lane in Williamsons Road turning left into Foote Street, in addition to the traffic heading east when the lights change, plus the turning traffic from Williamsons Road turning right to head east into Foote Street. At times the delay to exit Hawtin Street can be considerable.
The new design completely removes the ability to turn right into Foote Street from Hawtin Street. This is a minor inconvenience and the option to turn right when available would be nice. However providing the option to turn right means people can sit and wait forever to get the opportunity and don't think about the cars behind them waiting.
The real problem is this exit is already an issue. With the northern end of Hawtin Street in the new design becoming an issue to exit more cars will use the southern exit causing even longer delays.
To me this is a safety issue. Putting more traffic on this exit will put exiting drivers under pressure to exit when it might not be safe to do so.
12. One benefit of the new design is for those exiting Hawtin Street turning left into Porter Street to then turn left into Williamsons Road.
Because there will be a permanent jump lane for the bus (short bus lane) you can exit Hawtin Street into the bus lane and then left turn using the slip lane into Williamsons Road. Because the bus lane will be empty most of the time, as long as Hawtin Street isn't backed up by those using Hawtin Street as a rat run, this will make a good alternative to trying to exit Hawtin Street right into Foote Street. Yes we have to go north to go south, but it's a compromise that's perhaps acceptable.
People need to keep in mind you are allowed to travel up to 100 metres in a bus lane to exit and enter a road so using the bus lane in this way is legal,
https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/safety-and-road-rules/road-rules/a-to-z-of-road-rules/buses
12. A benefit of the new design is those exiting the Coles Express service station onto Fitzsimons Lane can use the bus lane for up to 100 metres and safely merge into the traffic.
13. The addition of a left turn lane heading north from Williamsons Road into Porter Street heading west seems to me like a complete waste of time. The volume of cars turning left into Porter Street could easily use the bus lane to turn left without overly affecting the bus times.
14. The U-Turn in Porter Street to assist those entering the Templestowe Reserve and Hawtin Street should to a large degree overcome the removal of the direct turns. However it's uncertain if these will work well in busy times with cars not letting other cars through and no reason for them to do so except out of courtesy.
The right turn from Porter Street into Hawtin Street or the Templestowe Reserve could remain and not cause any major issues. The reason is these cars will not block the traffic on Porter Street heading east as cars are allowed into bus lanes to overtake a right turning vehicle.
I understand how right turning vehicles coming out of the Templestowe Reserve and Hawtin Street pose a safety issue trying to cross up to three lanes of traffic to turn right. This could be fixed by having exits out of Hawtin Street and the Templestowe Reserve to be left turn only.
This keeps the Keep Clear zones which enables cars to merge from Hawtin Street (and potentially the Templestowe Reserve if a Keep Clear was added) into the right lanes to turn into Fitzsimons Lane.
15. The removal of much of the mound separating the end of Clarke Street and Williamsons Road seems like it is unnecessary.
Is a left turn only lane here really that necessary? Surely cars turning left can share the bus lane.
Perhaps less of the mound can be removed if the left turn lane was not required.
Suggestion
1. Hawtin Street is a rat-run and that's understandable. We would all use a minor road if we felt it could improve our travel time. However these changes mean exiting out of Hawtin Street into Porter Street to turn right into Fitzsimons Lane will be near impossible in busy times. Even to exit Hawtin Street to turn left to continue on Porter Street, or left into Williamsons Road will be near impossible unless cars are made to leave room, which is what the Keep Clear does.
Is it possible to have Hawtin Street as local traffic only and impose fines?
Keep the Keep Clear zone so cars can exit Hawtin Street more easily.
2. Carole Close is currently closed. Opening Carol Close onto Williamsons Road would enable the local traffic using Hawtin Street to enter and exit Hawtin Street. This change provides convenience for Hawtin Street users. It does however affect two properties in Carol Street where the properties have been subdivided.
To counter this if the U-Turn in Porter Street works and using the bus lane to turn left out of Hawtin Street and the slip lane into Williamsons Road means this change wouldn't be required. Reducing the volume of cars using Hawtin Street as a rat-run would mean this isn't really required.
3. Enforcing local traffic only along Hawtin Street could significantly help the flow of local traffic using Hawtin Street.
Conclusion
Overall I see the new design has reduced the amenity of local residents who need to use Hawtin Street. The area continues to get squeezed in terms of road access. To a degree this is understandable due to the increasing needs of the many who use Williamsons Road, Fitzsimons Lane and Foote Steet.
The fail in the design is since cars travelling along Porter Street no longer need to leave space for cars leaving Hawtin Street the drivers simply won't leave space. Cars won't be able to easily exit Hawtin Street into Porter Street to either continue on Porter Street or turn right into Fitzsimons Lane. A Keep Clear section will need to be added to enable cars to exit Hawtin Street into Porter Street. Whilst it is not legal for cars from Hawtin Street to sit in the Keep Clear area this seems to be the only practical way for cars to exit Hawtin Street.
Kelvin Eldridge
Please feel free to add your experiences of this intersection using the comments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



